ABSTRACT
Objective@#The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of osteopenia and osteoporosis by examining the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and femur in patients with gynecological cancer without bone metastasis and to evaluate the impact of treatment for different cancers on BMD. @*Methods@#This study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 243 women with gynecological cancer and 240 controls between March 2010 and December 2016. Patients with cervical cancer (n=105), endometrial cancer (n=63), and ovarian cancer (n=75) were treated with total hysterectomy including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and/or chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. For the control group, healthy post-menopausal women without gynecologic cancer were selected. @*Results@#Before anticancer treatment, the BMD of patients with cervical cancer and ovarian cancer was significantly lower than that of the controls, and the BMD of patients with endometrial cancer was not significantly different from that of the controls. However, the BMD of endometrial cancer significantly decreased after treatment. According to the treatment methods, there were significant differences in the BMD of L3, L4, and the femur neck. Changes in the BMD were lowest in patients who underwent surgical treatment only, and the highest bone loss was found in patients who underwent postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy. @*Conclusion@#Patients with cervical and ovarian cancer had lower BMD than those in the control group before treatment, and patients with endometrial cancer had decreased bone density after treatment. Therefore, during the treatment of gynecological cancer, strategies should be implemented to mitigate these risks.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of osteopenia and osteoporosis by examining the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and femur in patients with gynecological cancer without bone metastasis and to evaluate the impact of treatment for different cancers on BMD. @*Methods@#This study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 243 women with gynecological cancer and 240 controls between March 2010 and December 2016. Patients with cervical cancer (n=105), endometrial cancer (n=63), and ovarian cancer (n=75) were treated with total hysterectomy including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and/or chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. For the control group, healthy post-menopausal women without gynecologic cancer were selected. @*Results@#Before anticancer treatment, the BMD of patients with cervical cancer and ovarian cancer was significantly lower than that of the controls, and the BMD of patients with endometrial cancer was not significantly different from that of the controls. However, the BMD of endometrial cancer significantly decreased after treatment. According to the treatment methods, there were significant differences in the BMD of L3, L4, and the femur neck. Changes in the BMD were lowest in patients who underwent surgical treatment only, and the highest bone loss was found in patients who underwent postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy. @*Conclusion@#Patients with cervical and ovarian cancer had lower BMD than those in the control group before treatment, and patients with endometrial cancer had decreased bone density after treatment. Therefore, during the treatment of gynecological cancer, strategies should be implemented to mitigate these risks.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the preoperative diagnostic clues to ovarian pregnancy (OP). METHODS: This study conducted a retrospective chart review of 23 patients with OP and 46 patients with tubal pregnancy (TP) from October 1, 2003 to September 31, 2016 in Hanyang University Hospital. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the two groups. The presence of an ectopic gestational sac and hemoperitoneum was significantly higher in the TP group (13.0% vs. 95.7%, P=0.000; 13.0% vs. 54.3%, P=0.001, respectively) in preoperative ultrasonogram. The OP group had more ruptured ectopic gestational sacs than the TP group (73.9% vs. 45.7%, P=0.039) in surgical findings. CONCLUSION: For the patients in whom a gestational sac is not detected in the uterus or the fallopian tubes, it is important to be aware of the possibility of OP and rupture of an ovarian gestational sac to promote early diagnosis and surgical intervention.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Early Diagnosis , Fallopian Tubes , Gestational Sac , Hemoperitoneum , Laparoscopy , Pregnancy, Ovarian , Pregnancy, Tubal , Retrospective Studies , Rupture , Ultrasonography , UterusABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and surgical outcomes of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) for women with anterior wall adherence after cesarean section. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 328 women with prior cesarean section history who underwent LAVH from March 2003 to July 2013. The subjects were classified into two groups: group A, with anterior wall adherence (n=49); group B, without anterior wall adherence (n=279). We compared the demographic, clinical characteristics, and surgical outcomes of two groups. RESULTS: The median age and parity of the patients were 46 years (range, 34 to 70 years) and 2 (1 to 6). Patients with anterior wall adherence had longer operating times (175 vs. 130 minutes, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in age, parity, number of cesarean section, body mass index, specimen weight, postoperative change in hemoglobin concentration, or length of hospital stay between the two groups. There was one case from each group who sustained bladder laceration during the vaginal portion of the procedure, both repaired vaginally. There was no conversion to abdominal hysterectomy in either group. CONCLUSION: LAVH is effective and safe for women with anterior wall adherence after cesarean section.